Did Megan Walker pause to consider that some Londoners might value due process and the right to be presumed innocent?

I believe any fair organization that benefits any citizen has every right to be supported by any who choose. Of recently I have become concerned with one of London’s community organizations. Specifically, Megan Walker and the London Abused Women’s Centre. Their public statements and actions have me concerned. I am a simple man but my vision of the situation is an uncharged American has been targeted by this individual if not this organization.

“To have him appear in public is inconsistent with the values of London,” said Megan Walker, executive director of the London Abused Women’s Centre.

I don’t get out much but when did Mayor Matt Brown make Megan Walker the Value Commissioner?

Does the self-described radical feminist and executive director of the London Abused Women’s Centre have a pulse on the values of London?

I’m afraid of someone who thinks she knows the values of London considering all the cultures, religions and experiences of a population in the hundreds of thousands.

Did Megan Walker pause to consider that some Londoners might value due process and the right to be presumed innocent?

I hope I don’t have to eat my words by finding out she has a PhD in values assessment. Is she going to try and tell Londoners what can appear on their Netflix?

What if I proclaim that having Megan Walker appear in public is inconsistent with the values of London? If what she thinks is valid and should be prescribed to the entire population of London why can’t I attempt the same? Lucky for Megan Walker I’m unlikely to be on FM 96 or at the helm of an organization with avenues and influence politically and with the press.

I am curious to know why Megan Walker appears to have an aversion to due process and the presumption of innocence. Both are for the protection of all citizens even her and the mayor.

Londoners who support the London Abused Women’s Centre have a right to ask Megan Walker:

Will the London Abused Women’s Centre be campaigning against uncharged Canadian citizens and if so what criteria will be used to decide on an appropriate action?

Are Megan Walkers public opinions to be considered the official position of the London Abused Women’s Centre?

What parts of the law will the London Abused Women’s Centre be supporting for the remainder of the charter year?

What documentation was used to guide the statements and actions of the London Abused Women’s Centre regarding this uncharged American?

Are their recent actions a precedent and what measures of proof will the London Abused Women’s Centre use as a guide to similar actions against Canadian citizens?

There is no need to win the battles of public opinion unless you thirst for something justice will not deliver.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s